37 research outputs found
Clinical performance and Willingness To Pay for soft toric contact lenses in low and moderate astigmats
Purpose: To determine clinical performance and the ‘Willingness To Pay’ for toric vs. spherical soft contact lenses in an astigmatic population. Methods: In the clinical study, subjects with binocular low to moderate astigmatism (-0.75DC to − 1.50DC) wore pairs of soft toric (Biofinity toric) and spherical (Biofinity) contact lenses in random sequence. Visual acuity (high and low contrast, monocular and binocular), subjective comfort and subjective vision were recorded. In the economics study, first subjects who had participated in the clinical study were presented with a series of randomised economic scenarios in order to determine their Willingness To Pay a premium (i.e. an increase) for toric lenses. Then, a similar set of scenarios were presented to a much larger group of online respondents and again, Willingness To Pay was established. Results: For the four measures of visual acuity, the Biofinity toric lens out-performed the Biofinity spherical lens by 0.6 to 1.1 lines.. Subjective vision performance was statistically significantly better with the toric lens for the distance task only. Comfort scores were not significantly different. Similar findings for Willingness To Pay were established for the clinical subjects and for the online respondents. The Willingness To Pay premium (additional fee) for a monthly supply of toric lenses (over spherical lenses) was between £13 and £16, if a toric lens provides better vision and similar comfort, as shown in the clinical study. Conclusion: Consumers are willing to pay a monthly premium of around 50% to benefit from the typical experience of better vision and similar comfort for toric vs. spherical lenses. The level of additional cost for toric lenses compared to their spherical equivalents is less than this in the market, so eye care professionals should consider that toric lenses are delivering a greater clinical return than anticipated by wearers for the relatively small increase in price
Recommended from our members
Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers
Purpose
Despite the widespread practice of gradually adapting all new soft contact lens wearers (neophytes), there is little evidence-based research underpinning such practice. This work determined if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
Method
At four sites, neophytes (19–32 years) were randomly assigned to an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear-time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h) with hydrogel (n = 24 fast; n = 21 gradual) or silicone-hydrogel (n = 10 fast; n = 10 gradual) contact lenses. Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT). A range of subjective scores (using 0–100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the initial visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4–6 days and 12–14 days after initial fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days.
Results
There was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology between the fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type. NIBUT was similar at all time points for both adaptation groups in both lens types with the exception that the gradual adaptation silicone-hydrogel wearers had a slightly longer NIBUT (p = 0.007) than the fast adaptation group at 12-14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of ‘lens awareness’ and ‘ease of lens removal’ which were better (p < 0.05) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at day 7. Additionally, ‘end-of-day discomfort’ was better (p = 0.02) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at 12–14 days.
Conclusion
There appears to be no benefit in daily disposable soft contact lens adaptation for neophytes with modern contact lens materials
The Effect of Fractal Contact Lenses on Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Model Eyes
Purpose: To test multizone contact lenses in model eyes: Fractal Contact Lenses (FCLs), designed to induce
myopic peripheral refractive error (PRE).
Methods: Zemax ray-tracing software was employed to simulate myopic and accommodation-dependent model
eyes fitted with FCLs. PRE, defined in terms of mean sphere M and 90–180 astigmatism J180, was computed at
different peripheral positions, ranging from 0 to 35 in steps of 5, and for different pupil diameters (PDs).
Simulated visual performance and changes in the PRE were also analyzed for contact lens decentration and
model eye accommodation. For comparison purposes, the same simulations were performed with another
commercially available contact lens designed for the same intended use: the Dual Focus (DF).
Results: PRE was greater with FCL than with DF when both designs were tested for a 3.5 mm PD, and with and
without decentration of the lenses. However, PRE depended on PD with both multizone lenses, with a
remarkable reduction of the myopic relative effect for a PD of 5.5 mm. The myopic PRE with contact lenses
decreased as the myopic refractive error increased, but this could be compensated by increasing the power
of treatment zones. A peripheral myopic shift was also induced by the FCLs in the accommodated model eye.
In regard to visual performance, a myopia under-correction with reference to the circle of least confusion
was obtained in all cases for a 5.5 mm PD. The ghost images, generated by treatment zones of FCL, were
dimmer than the ones produced with DF lens of the same power.
Conclusions: FCLs produce a peripheral myopic defocus without compromising central vision in photopic
conditions. FCLs have several design parameters that can be varied to obtain optimum results: lens diameter,
number of zones, addition and asphericity; resulting in a very promising customized lens for the treatment
of myopia progression.This research was supported by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (grant FIS2011-23175), the Generalitat Valenciana (grant PROMETEO2009-077) and the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (grant INNOVA SP20120569), Spain.Rodríguez Vallejo, M.; Benlloch Fornés, JI.; Pons Martí, A.; Monsoriu Serra, JA.; Furlan, WD. (2014). The Effect of Fractal Contact Lenses on Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Model Eyes. Current Eye Research. 39(12):1-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2014.903498S110391
Nurses' perceptions of aids and obstacles to the provision of optimal end of life care in ICU
Contains fulltext :
172380.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access